This paper summarizes the result of a capacity assessment study undertaken in the Kakattehchi Neighborhood, Tabriz. Initially, the DEVELOPMENT capacity for four main categories is estimated: location, function, services and stability. Then the current land use is compared with the carrying capacity of each category and subcategory. It is then demonstrated that by rehabilitating the existing infrastructure the neighborhood has the potential for a 40% increase in its population.

Purpose: The purpose of this applied research is to study the effectiveness of gamification on corporate training.  Methodology: A gamified course was designed and implemented to train the location of Fire Hosing Cabinet for 24 employees of a firefighting maintenance company in Iran Mall shopping Center in Tehran. Using a quantitative quasi-experimental research plan (post-test only control group design) the participants of the study were randomly assigned to treatment (12) and control (12) groups and trained for a week.  Conclusion: The descriptive and interpretive result of the posttest analyses indicated the effectiveness of gamification of the training performed for the employees of the firefighting maintenance company in Iran Mall shopping Center in Tehran. Moreover, the descriptive result of Gamification Acceptance Questionnaire answered by the members of the experimental group after gamified training indicated that all the participants in the experimental group were satisfied with the gamified training course.

COMMUNITY-based DEVELOPMENT in Iran has often been translated as neighborhood-based DEVELOPMENT. In the local DEVELOPMENT model, the local COMMUNITY is considered very general, whereas in the COMMUNITY-based DEVELOPMENT model, the local COMMUNITY is focused on local contexts and structures that have social issues and problems according to the DEVELOPMENT capacities based on the local COMMUNITY. Urban management in Tehran in the last decade with a series of different measures (Distinguish neighborhood boundaries, The construction of COMMUNITY center (Saraye Mahale), implementation of social, cultural and health programs, at the level of urban neighborhoods, etc) have sought to institutionalize this type of DEVELOPMENT. The present article focuses on theoretical and experimental issues in the field of local COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and the requirements of this type of DEVELOPMENT to examine its challenges in Tehran and the set of measures that have been taken in this regard. Relying on the data of two studies in Tehran (pathology of neighborhood management and social and cultural typology of Tehran neighborhoods), which has been done quantitatively and qualitatively, the article addresses the challenges of this type of DEVELOPMENT in Tehran. The findings of the paper show that DEVELOPMENT is based on a local COMMUNITY based on contexts and requirements, and focuses on specific goals and specific contexts of cities, not all contexts. While the strategies of DEVELOPMENT based on local COMMUNITY (Council elections, establishing COMMUNITY center (Saraye Mahale) and neighborhood management, etc. ) without considering these contexts and requirements of this DEVELOPMENT based on local COMMUNITY in Tehran This has led to the failure of these strategies in the DEVELOPMENT of the local COMMUNITY and the achievement of the consequences of this type of DEVELOPMENT after the implementation of these strategies. Lack of attention to the contexts and requirements based on the DEVELOPMENT of the local COMMUNITY in Tehran, the activities carried out have led to spending a lot of money so far, which seems to have not yielded significant results in this area. At the end, several specific suggestions are presented to address the challenges of this type of DEVELOPMENT, with the main emphasis on changing the perception of local communities that should be the focus of DEVELOPMENT.

COMMUNITY as one of the tools of urban planning has been raised to overcome the problems of the urban system during the twentieth century and is taken into consideration from different viewpoints. DEVELOPMENT at the local level and finding democratic solutions, dedicate an important part of urban planning to itself. Therefore, a deeper understanding of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, and bridging the gap can understand the planners in m right decisions and prepare appropriate plans to lead urban communities. On the other hand, social networking is a critical issue for human societies, which can has a vital connection with the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT system. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between social networks with COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT in the Fahadan COMMUNITY of Yazd city. The methodology of this research in terms of aim is application - DEVELOPMENT and in terms of the nature and method is descriptive – analytical. The used tool is a questionnaire that has been analyzed SPSS and Amos software’s. The results show that there is a direct relationship between social networks and the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, according to research findings, the impact of social networks on COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT is 0.70 percent. The Standardized Beta coefficient in components of social participation by a factor of (b=0.172), network quality by a factor of (b=0.111), civic participation by a factor of (b=0.092), also has the largest share in explaining the DEVELOPMENT of COMMUNITY planning sequentially. Structural equation modeling results show that with the increase of social trust, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT components also increase.

Local COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT topic, in spite of a relatively long history in scientific and executive texts, are considered by the West in the late 1980s as a local DEVELOPMENT and as a major issue. However, in the Islamic cities, the topic of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT in spite of its epistemological foundations has been considered less, and there are few written sources available, and the number of books and research published in this regard are very few. Therefore, recognizing the indices and their importance for developing the model in order to COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT which is appropriate with Islamic cities condition can make this planning approach more effective than before. In this regard, the aim of this paper is to recognize the elements of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT model and the method of this research with regards to research questions and goals is qualitative that made from two phases of systematic review of literature and survey –, unreview by elites by method of Delphi. In this research, the main dimensions of the proposed model, obtained from three rounds of the Delphi method, including four components, 13 criteria and 23 indicators. In this model, the weight of each category and order of the indicators importance in each category are shown. According to research experts, the practical policies of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT with the score of 8/31 is the most important indicators in the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT pattern in the Islamic city which has the criteria such as justice,responsibility, enabling and participation in neighborhoods affairs. The social capital factor in the second place with the score of 8/27, fiscal assets of COMMUNITY with score of 8/23 and institutions and influential factors with the score of 8/15 are in the nest ranks. In the final step f third round in Delphi method, Kendal consistency quotients has been calculated 0/59 for this research that can be trusted normally.

Social entrepreneurship is a process by which entrepreneurs build or transform institutions to advance solutions to social problems, such as poverty, illness, illiteracy, environmental destruction, human rights abuses and corruption, in order to make life better for many. Social Entrepreneurship can reorganize and rearrange human, economic and social assets to answer needs of communities. It means Social Entrepreneurship helps to show the social responsibility of firms and companies to the social problems produced because of unbalanced DEVELOPMENT. Social Entrepreneurship redistributes the economic values by economic sector in to the COMMUNITY which has the positive effects on the social sector. Additionally, Social Entrepreneurship can reduce anxiety or eliminate many problems like poverty. This article aimed to elaborate the concept of Social Entrepreneurship and its differentials aspects from common types by providing a theoretical perspective. Theoretical findings show that Social Entrepreneurship has one of the most important effects on COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and promote human DEVELOPMENT. If COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT is defined as a planning effort to produce physical, human, social, financial capital, Social Entrepreneurship will be used as new strategies and tactics to solve social problems. Social entrepreneurs try to expand the education and the employment as well as decrease the rate of crime which lead COMMUNITY to be more safe and secure. In addition, Social Entrepreneurship practice can end to the many individual and intangible outcomes such as improving self-confidence, promoting trust and building social capacity. So distribution of resources and services can help to the Marginal groups such as women, disabled group, elder people, immigrants and others play as an activist in to the COMMUNITY.

This paper has investigated prospects for an asset-based approach to COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, as opposed to the conventional need-based. This approach has three characteristics. Emphasizing capacity building, it is process-oriented. It is also comprehensive in that it capitalizes on a COMMUNITY's social and physical assets. Finally, it has 'instrumental' significance because it uses social and physical capital as means to other ends. Conversely however, the need-based approach is outcome-oriented; is categorical, and has intrinsic importance because it views the symptoms of poverty as deficiencies that ought to be addressed separately. This view has 'intrinsic' importance because individual goals become ends in themselves.